Efficient and affordable software for Macintosh - Maker of MaxBulk Mailer, eMail extractor, eMail Checker, e-Mail Bounce Handler

Home

Products

Downloads

News

Store

Support

Forums

Forums


 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 
554 Denied - What does it mean?
Goto page Previous  1, 2
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Maxprog Forum Index -> MaxBulk Mailer
Author Message
stanbusk
Site Admin


Joined: 28 Dec 2005
Posts: 2178

PostPosted: Mon Sep 18, 2006 2:59 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I would recommend you not to use Word to create this message and check the result. Word uses a lot of invisible control characters that can produce unexpected effects. Note that inline attachments in styled text can only be pictures, you can't use a PDF.

Last edited by stanbusk on Mon Sep 18, 2006 8:53 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
mapski99



Joined: 14 Sep 2006
Posts: 25
Location: Earth

PostPosted: Mon Sep 18, 2006 5:48 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Stan,

PDFs are only being attached, graphics are being dropped inline.

Part of the probem is that Maxmailer on a 500Mhz G3 ibook is slow as molasses when typing. And that is after shutting down every other application. When other applications are running, it can take 10 seconds to type a word.

The other problem is that the files are being created, edited, and styled in Word. Users are collaborating on the content of Word files that are being shared and moved around. A long file is going to be a pain to edit over and over in MaxMailer as changes are made to the Word file. Even in a single user environment it's extra work. In a group environment, Word is the standard and that is how work is created and edited.

I tried copying from MS Word to TextEdit (RTF mode). Saving, then copy to MaxMailer. That didn't help.

Are you suggesting copy from Word to something like BBEdit? That would be the same as saving the Word file to TextOnly. Either way, all formatting would have to be done in MaxMailer.
Back to top
mapski99



Joined: 14 Sep 2006
Posts: 25
Location: Earth

PostPosted: Mon Sep 18, 2006 6:14 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Stan,

MS Word is the most popular text editor in the world, yet there is no mention of these "known" problems of cut/paste between MaxBulk Mailer and Word.

Every other part of the program is great. I recommended it to my client after evaluating many other programs. Inline images and styled text were a big selling point. Only after spending time learning it and teaching the program to the client, did we run across the bug....just as a campaign was supposed to be sent out the door. Everything looked fine, then hours of troubleshooting ensued after the 554 error.

I just rechecked your documentation.....

1. Under composing a message, it says "You can drop text files or paste text from any other text editor to the message field as well."

2. Under Message Formats > Styled Text (Pro), it says, "MaxBulk Mailer converts all the text into HTML code".

3. Attachments > Inline Attachments, it says: "MaxBulk supports inline attachments and inline pictures in the message body."

Considering that Styled Text is only in the "Pro" version which costs more, and the populatiry of MS Word, you should really have notes and warnings about using MaxBulk with MS Word in your documentation, and probablly even in the sales literature.
Back to top
mapski99



Joined: 14 Sep 2006
Posts: 25
Location: Earth

PostPosted: Mon Sep 18, 2006 6:19 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

stanbusk wrote:
I would recommend you not to use Word to create this message and check the result. Word uses a lot of invisible control characters that can produce unexpected effects. Note that inline attachments in styled text can only be pictures, you can't use a PDF.


Stan,

Where do you "recommend avoiding using Word to create messages"? I just re-read your last post. I didn't see it in the docs or on the product site.

It's good to know that you recognize the problem with cut and paste between Word and Maxmailer, or else I might have spent more time trying to find the magic combination that worked.
Back to top
stanbusk
Site Admin


Joined: 28 Dec 2005
Posts: 2178

PostPosted: Mon Sep 18, 2006 7:12 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Let's see.

#1 The MHTML format is what we use to send Styled Text and HTML with inline pictures. Using attachments (not inline) with such format is not recommended because some applications will not render the whole message properly. Use a link to your PDF document on your site instead.

#2 MaxBulk being slow when typing is a system issue. If you use MaxBulk in a different account on your system or reinstall that system you will find out the problem disappears. As far as I know it comes from duplicates or corrupted fonts.

#3 No problem if you use Word but if you want to avoid problems, copy the text, paste it the TextWrangler or BBEdit, select all and use the Zap Gremlins function. I have seen a lot of customers using Word without problems and without doing anything other than copying and pasting text as is. The problem I think is some control character that is transmitted to MaxBulk thru the clipboard. Some characters are forbidden in an e-mail message.

#4 There is not a known or unknown problem with Word. There are rare occasions where copying and pasting from Word can give problems. Right now I am not sure where it comes from but the problems I have seen so far just caused some little glitches to styles, not a 554 error. What you could do is to first try with the MaxBulk document that gives problem and remove half the text, Then try again. If it still doesn't work remove more text. You can do that until it works. Then try to localize the exact place it fails. It would be interesting to see what character or if invisible the character code that is causing that. An other good idea is to contact your postmaster and ask what the error 554 means and why you get it.

I repeat again, we do not say anywhere anything about incompatibilities with Word because it is not the case. I would say more that 50% MaxBulk customers use MaxBulk with Word. It is not a bug either. First we should pinpoint where your problem actually is, and then add a filter or something to MaxBulk. Note that MaxBulk already filters a lot of forbidden characters.
Back to top
mapski99



Joined: 14 Sep 2006
Posts: 25
Location: Earth

PostPosted: Mon Sep 18, 2006 10:19 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

stanbusk wrote:
#4 There is not a known or unknown problem with Word. There are rare occasions where copying and pasting from Word can give problems.


It's a known problem to me as I spent 5+ hours trying to troubleshoot the problem. Also, you suggest not to copy and paste from Word to maxbulk, and you state right there that on rare occassions it can occur - so it's known to be a problem.

stanbusk wrote:
What you could do is to first try with the MaxBulk document that gives problem and remove half the text, Then try again. If it still doesn't work remove more text. You can do that until it works. Then try to localize the exact place it fails. It would be interesting to see what character or if invisible the character code that is causing that.


I have already done this to certain level. Of course at that point I didn't know that Word "could" be a problem, so I was considering image format, character length, inline image position as factors as well.

I will give it a shot with this document to see if I can isolate the problem.
Back to top
mapski99



Joined: 14 Sep 2006
Posts: 25
Location: Earth

PostPosted: Mon Sep 18, 2006 10:43 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I contacted Verio (the mail/web host), and they state that 554 is related to their spam filter on their side which is blocking the message.

Their website FAQs stating that 554 was something different - grrrr.

No wonder I couldn't isolate specific characters within the Word file that were causing trouble.
Back to top
stanbusk
Site Admin


Joined: 28 Dec 2005
Posts: 2178

PostPosted: Tue Sep 19, 2006 3:27 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Sorry if my explanations were not clear. About #4, it is not a known problem because it is the very first time I hear about error 554. It is also the first time I hear a piece of text is causing a protocol error.

What is known about Word is that in rare occasions some styles were not properly rendered, nothing else. Usually reformatting that piece of text were enough. Actually I saw that problem in Mac OS 9 and first Mac OS X versions. I haven't heard of it in some time now. In any case that wasn't causing protocol errors. Just text supposed to be bold wasn't or things like that. That problem was caused by invisible control characters wrongly passed to MaxBulk thru the clipboard. As far as I know that problem were fixed with last Mac OS X versions.

In your case I thought it could be something related to this *rare known issue*. But it is clear it is not the same.

554 error code can mean anything actually. As you state below it can be also triggered by a spam filter. Personally I think it is a big error from Verio then. Anyway, try to look at that article "avoiding to be caught by spam filter". It contains the address of a spam test system you can use to get a spam report for your message.
Back to top
mapski99



Joined: 14 Sep 2006
Posts: 25
Location: Earth

PostPosted: Tue Sep 19, 2006 4:51 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Stan,

It turns out that the entire problem was VERIO.

VERIO has unsophisticated filters on our shared hosting account. They are tagging our outgoing mail as SPAM.

Verio as incorrectly states what the 554 error means on their webpages, which lead me down the wrong path. After your suggestions to go through line by line and check to see what is causing the problem in Word, I was unable to find any reasonable patterm. So I finally called Verio. That is when they said it's an spam filter on the outgoing mail.

Using the MaxBulk 'spam' review tool, I was able to change the Subject to get the full text through. But it wouldn't work with the inline image.


Last edited by mapski99 on Tue Sep 19, 2006 4:59 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
mapski99



Joined: 14 Sep 2006
Posts: 25
Location: Earth

PostPosted: Tue Sep 19, 2006 4:51 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Stan,

I am sorry that I took so much of your time.

You have been very responsive and helpful.


Last edited by mapski99 on Tue Sep 19, 2006 5:00 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
mapski99



Joined: 14 Sep 2006
Posts: 25
Location: Earth

PostPosted: Tue Sep 19, 2006 4:59 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

In Summary,

MaxBulk Mailer was not responsible for my "554 denied" error at all. The problem was at the mail host.

The mail host was treating our outgoing message as spam and blocking it.

Cut and paste from Word to MaxBulk was not the problem at all.

MaxBulk Mailer worked great once I used a different mail host that wasn't treating my mail as spam.

MaxBulk rocks!

Stan was very reponsive as helpful.

-J
Back to top
mapski99



Joined: 14 Sep 2006
Posts: 25
Location: Earth

PostPosted: Tue Sep 19, 2006 5:03 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

If you get a "554" error when sending mail -> CALL YOUR ISP!

Don't mess around with settings, find out how your mail host/isp classifies a "554" error message. Ask them why you are getting the error.

-J
Back to top
stanbusk
Site Admin


Joined: 28 Dec 2005
Posts: 2178

PostPosted: Tue Sep 19, 2006 5:56 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Good to hear! I was a bit worried about what was causing that problem. Now it is clear. Thanks for the updates. They will be useful for other users.
Back to top
FordTruckMan



Joined: 06 Oct 2006
Posts: 1

PostPosted: Fri Oct 06, 2006 1:27 pm    Post subject: Any other solution from Verio? Reply with quote

Hi - just joining in after suddenly encountering these same problems on my Verio-hosted email/web/etc plan. I've sent mailings out to our mailing list many times before with no problems until Wednesday of this week (just got lucky? something recently changed?)

I guess my question is: Did Verio offer any other solution to the problem? (i.e. they could agree to NOT mark you mail as spam or tell you what to avoid or anything like that?)
Back to top
nanoplanet



Joined: 09 Oct 2006
Posts: 1

PostPosted: Mon Oct 09, 2006 3:02 am    Post subject: Re: Any other solution from Verio? Reply with quote

FordTruckMan wrote:
Hi - just joining in after suddenly encountering these same problems on my Verio-hosted email/web/etc plan. I've sent mailings out to our mailing list many times before with no problems until Wednesday of this week (just got lucky? something recently changed?)

I guess my question is: Did Verio offer any other solution to the problem? (i.e. they could agree to NOT mark you mail as spam or tell you what to avoid or anything like that?)


Jumping in to this discussion, grateful to find it. Also a Verio customer (since way back when, several acquisitions ago they were a sweet little hosting company called Hiway), and ready to depart because of this and other mail-related challenges.

Have been likewise frustrated with increases in the 554:Denied responses in (in my case) Eudora, for just regular solo emails. Figured out that it was content-related at the SMTP level early on; though to be frank, knowing that didn't and doesn't make it any less annoying.

Am seriously on the lookout now for a viable business email solution that is not bound up with webhosting. My sense is that these very large companies simply get overwhelmed by their spam issues, and tend to use blunt instruments on them.

Anyway, have found some things that can help get legitimate emails past the lame 554 denials, at least on Verio:
1) Take out anything that says "Fwd," and the attendant ">" marks.
2) Take out any language - down to single words - that could be construed as, um, colorful, even if it is not meant in that way. If you happen to have Eudora, and the software gives your message a hot pepper, it'll usually highlight the "questionable" text so you'll know what to change.
3) This one sucks - take out any hyperlink in your message that looks like it could, even remotely, come from any source that spammers are known to frequent. (Just took out a hyperlink that included topica.com, and voila, the message went through. Imagine if that link had been the entire point of the message... fortunately, it wasn't.)

Any suggestions for excellent (read: intelligent) hosted business email with 24/7 phone support? At reasonable rates? Yours truly and clients are all ears.

Thanks!
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Maxprog Forum Index -> MaxBulk Mailer All times are GMT
Goto page Previous  1, 2
Page 2 of 2

 


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
captcha mod by phpbb-security.com

Home

Products

Downloads

News

Store

Support

Forums


Maxprog ® - MAX Programming, LLC - © 2001-2006 - All Rights reserved
Company Info | Site Map | Legal Notice | Privacy Policy | Jobs